March 21st, 2008 (12:56 am)
current location:
home
mood: raving mad!
Have to get this one off my chest!
Perhaps I should've known better than to fill that gap in my uni schedule with a writing subject, but hey I love writing... but in every writing class, there's always one...
This one's name is Nellie, and I have fostered a raging hate fuelled by her extreme ignorance and a seeming love for telling others the rules.
Here's the short version of the story:
Assignment one has a Haiku task, with very loose rules and open direction. So I post to the workshop forum my ideas on how a 3-5-3 format is more true to the Japanese aesthetic than the 5-7-5 rule taught in high school. Here is her response...
"We have been given a Set Task in the Assignment
That is to Produce a Haiku in English with 17 Syllables in the 5/7/5 Format So it doesn't matter what we think what is better or not
The aim is to make us produce to the rules laid down
ie we have to answer the question as in any essay that the Tutor sets
That is the Challenge to find words that fit
So no point arguing or wondering is there anyone who agrees or disagrees with the format given"
So infuriating. The aim of any writing course is to explore form, style and function, part of that exploration is to bend, break or circumvent all or any of the rules you please, with the intention of improvement.
But here I see a woman who will NEVER write well, she will write mediocre dribble all whilst following some rules she believes are unbreakable. Her lack of creative anything sickens me.
But the one thing that has just tipped me over the edge is this....
Not only is she suggesting that writing is about sticking to the status quo, she is saying it in away that is discouraging others from experimenting asking them to walk the same safe path she chooses.
Writing is about challenging the status quo.
I have no doubt that Nellie will pass, in that she will complete each requested task, but I would rather fail a thousand times than produce a piece of work that so violates the very essence of writing.
Here was my (2nd) very polite reply, in which I refrained from calling her an old cunt.
"Hi Nellie,
I believe Jane has left the Haiku quite open to interpretation. I quote from the detailed FAQ. "5-7-5 is easy enough for the Haiku, as is 14 lines for a sonnet, but I care more for originality than merely form..."
I am only opening up a line of thought on the form of Haiku, that others may also be interested in. Believing or following in this idea I have presented, is entirely up to the individual. I believe sharing thoughts on form and style to be in the spirit of workshopping.
I respect your choice to regard or disregard the information I have presented, but I believe that there is always a point to discussing form and rules, and I imagine that even if there had been a hard and fast rule about form for the Haiku, I would still have presented this opinion in this open forum.
Many thanks for your comments."